<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenIDs at LiveJournal leaking auth info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.terrellrussell.com/2007/05/openids-at-livejournal-leaking-auth-info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.terrellrussell.com/2007/05/openids-at-livejournal-leaking-auth-info/</link>
	<description>Ideas on interconnections, identity, and information from all sides.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://weblog.terrellrussell.com/2007/05/openids-at-livejournal-leaking-auth-info/#comment-13434</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 18:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.terrellrussell.com/2007/05/openids-at-livejournal-leaking-auth-info/#comment-13434</guid>
		<description>SUP has a deal with livejournal, kommersant has a deal with SUP, but the end result is that my info is leaked without my authorization both to SUP and kommersant. What prevents kommersant from having a deal with some other company and leaking it even further?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SUP has a deal with livejournal, kommersant has a deal with SUP, but the end result is that my info is leaked without my authorization both to SUP and kommersant. What prevents kommersant from having a deal with some other company and leaking it even further?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrell Russell</title>
		<link>http://weblog.terrellrussell.com/2007/05/openids-at-livejournal-leaking-auth-info/#comment-13423</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrell Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 16:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.terrellrussell.com/2007/05/openids-at-livejournal-leaking-auth-info/#comment-13423</guid>
		<description>So, Joe, this is to say that this isn't as much a leak in OpenID or LiveJournal's implementation of it - but rather, a business deal with ramifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Joe, this is to say that this isn&#8217;t as much a leak in OpenID or LiveJournal&#8217;s implementation of it - but rather, a business deal with ramifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://weblog.terrellrussell.com/2007/05/openids-at-livejournal-leaking-auth-info/#comment-13419</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 16:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.terrellrussell.com/2007/05/openids-at-livejournal-leaking-auth-info/#comment-13419</guid>
		<description>Simon, thanks for the link to the preapproved web sites, kommersant.ru and livejournal.ru are not on the list. The whole thing is a side effect of SUP.com / LiveJournal deal, where the rights to service russian part of livejournal were given to a russian company.  If you have livejournal account, sign into it and go to livejournal.ru and you will see your name in the top right corner. kommersant.ru has a deal with SUP / livejournal.ru to render comments. 

That means that even when you are not in russia you can be tracked by a moscow based company as you visit sites they have a deal with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon, thanks for the link to the preapproved web sites, kommersant.ru and livejournal.ru are not on the list. The whole thing is a side effect of SUP.com / LiveJournal deal, where the rights to service russian part of livejournal were given to a russian company.  If you have livejournal account, sign into it and go to livejournal.ru and you will see your name in the top right corner. kommersant.ru has a deal with SUP / livejournal.ru to render comments. </p>
<p>That means that even when you are not in russia you can be tracked by a moscow based company as you visit sites they have a deal with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Spero</title>
		<link>http://weblog.terrellrussell.com/2007/05/openids-at-livejournal-leaking-auth-info/#comment-13334</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Spero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 16:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.terrellrussell.com/2007/05/openids-at-livejournal-leaking-auth-info/#comment-13334</guid>
		<description>check_immediate should fail if the RP has not previously been approved.  I haven't checked to see if this isn't being done, but LJ does check authorization if checkid_setup is used.

The list of sites pre-authorized to check credentials can be edited at &lt;a href="http://www.livejournal.com/openid/options.bml" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.livejournal.com/openid/options.bml&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check_immediate should fail if the RP has not previously been approved.  I haven&#8217;t checked to see if this isn&#8217;t being done, but LJ does check authorization if checkid_setup is used.</p>
<p>The list of sites pre-authorized to check credentials can be edited at <a href="http://www.livejournal.com/openid/options.bml" rel="nofollow">http://www.livejournal.com/openid/options.bml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara Kelly</title>
		<link>http://weblog.terrellrussell.com/2007/05/openids-at-livejournal-leaking-auth-info/#comment-13333</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 16:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.terrellrussell.com/2007/05/openids-at-livejournal-leaking-auth-info/#comment-13333</guid>
		<description>I have no idea if this rumor is true or not.

Nonetheless - and I may be generalizing too much so someone flame me if I'm out of bounds - I would tend to think it's better to choose a *dedicated* OpenID provider than to just trust your blogging platform.

Why? Because blogging platforms are specialized in blogs, whereas dedicated OpenID services are specialized in OpenID. There's a big difference there.

Just my 2c.
Cheers,
Tara</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea if this rumor is true or not.</p>
<p>Nonetheless - and I may be generalizing too much so someone flame me if I&#8217;m out of bounds - I would tend to think it&#8217;s better to choose a *dedicated* OpenID provider than to just trust your blogging platform.</p>
<p>Why? Because blogging platforms are specialized in blogs, whereas dedicated OpenID services are specialized in OpenID. There&#8217;s a big difference there.</p>
<p>Just my 2c.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Tara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
