Two weeks ago the 2009 iConference was held at the Friday Center here in Chapel Hill, NC. There were lots of great posters and papers and hallway discussions.
We ran a Mechanical Turk study with over 2000 responses to help determine whether people would be willing to share their stuff more after some time had passed.
This study investigates users’ willingness to disclose information with respect to how long ago that information may have been created or captured. Users were more willing to share items as time passed.
Potentially, a â€śLater Buttonâ€ť should be put into practice to address this latent willingness (40% of sharing scenarios) to disclose information at a later date.
View blog reactions
The most striking outcome of this research is the apparent willingness of over 40% of people to share these types of information with others â€ślaterâ€ť, across demographics, the intimacy level of the item itself, and the perceived audience. This suggests a gaping disservice on the part of current tools.
Tools like Twitter and Facebook should consider an interface control that allows their users to designate the sharing of items â€ślaterâ€ť. The more granular data from this study (dividing â€ślaterâ€ť into more discrete chunks of time) suggests a strong default for this control to be set at â€śone monthâ€ť of elapsed time between the creation/capture of an information item and its availability to the designated audience.
The apparent collapse of nuance between â€śinnerâ€ť and â€śouterâ€ť audience and between â€śveryâ€ť and â€śsomewhatâ€ť intimate items suggests a flattening of how we understand and relate to our information sharing and our perceived audiences.
Are Facebook and/or Twitter to blame for this apparent flattening of our friendscape? Are all our friends equal when it comes to the mediated sharing of personal information?